Author Archive
Environmental Ethical Difficulties
Environmental ethical issues arise out of the interactions between the humans and the environment. There have been conflicting views on the intrinsic and the instrumental value of nature. Without due regard for environment’s intrinsic value we come under the condemnation of violating life most important ethical issue (White, 1967).
Lack of concerns for the environment beyond the anthropocentric self-centeredness violates environmental ethics. These concerns raised over decades before, brought the shocking revelations that nature was threatened by a time bomb.; It challenged the exclusive superiority of humans over the intrinsic value of nature. History of Environmental Ethical Issues
Environmental issues grew out of the scholarly work of pioneering work of Rachel Carson and the 1970′s events that the environmentalist that questioned the philosophy of questions facing the environment. White blamed the western science for adopting this rationale on the instrumental value of nature clearly depicted by their unethical destruction of nature and extremes of science.
Introducing Ecologic. It was Routley (1973) who classified western anthropocentric view as human chauvinism, a moral prejudice against nature. Realists supported environmental reforms whereas fundamentalist pushed for radical changes even calling for the overthrow of human capitalism (Woodrum, 1994).
The resulting negligence to observe moral ethics to the environment, the planet earth is now reeling under the effects of catastrophic activities of human activities.; Humans and the environment have now to grapple with global warming, ozone depletion, pollution and loss of natural resources. Global warming refers to has increased due carbon emission into the atmosphere. Undoubtedly pollution is another environmental issue. Noise pollution is another issue of concern. The Future of Environmental ethical Issues
How Are Humans Killing Wildlife? : A Level Environmental Scientific studies
The Pew Center on Global Climate Change was established in 1998 as a non-profit, non-partisan and independent organization whose mission is to address global warming (Pew). Alongside the creation of the Pew Center was the Business Environmental Leadership Council (BELC). BELC was created in the belief that businesses must develop efficient and effective solutions in addressing the climate problem.
Many well known companies are part of BELC, including: Boeing, BP, GE, Hewlett-Packard Company, IBM, Intel, Lockheed Martin, Maytag, Novartis, Toyota, and many other companies with tremendous market influence (BELC). It is extremely interesting to note that the Pew Center doesn’t receive money from the companies of the BELC. Instead, it receives its money from The Pew Charitable Trusts (“Pew Charitable”). The Pew Center and BELC companies hold four core beliefs.
Global Warming is a huge problem threatening the very existence of our species on this planet. Third, it encourages the domestic and international community to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.
The Pew Center is located in Arlington, Virginia. How can the world trust the Pew Center and BELC when the BELC companies are comprised of so many companies historically known to be huge polluters? The United States hasn’t signed the Kyoto Protocol, and the Pew Center admits “The Kyoto Protocol is the first step in the international process” (Pew). It will take 55 countries representing 55 percent of developed country emissions for the treaty to enter into force” (“Global”).
On one hand, you have developed countries reducing their emissions and finding energy alternatives. We even have the United States acknowledging the threat of global warming. However, a huge problem lies within developing countries.
The Pew Center on Global Climate Change and the BELC are engaged in a transnational controversy that extends all over the globe and includes extremely poor third world countries as well as very rich countries. They are ultimately trying to reduce and eliminate global warming. Global warming affects all nations, and all nations have contributed to the problem. How sincere are these companies in actually addressing global warming? It’s important to understand some of the IPE problems regarding global climate change before examining what the Pew Center has done about it.
A key environmental problem is in regards to growth in developing nations and there effect on environmental problems. Because the Pew Center’s goal is addressing global climate change, having all of these top companies pledging to do there part makes the Pew Center more credible and puts them at an advantage over other environmental groups because it has ties to these forty-one companies that represent over $2 trillion in market capitalization.
After extensive research, it’s fair to say there are no major critics of The Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
Addressing climate change is no simple task.
It seems that The Pew Center on Global Climate Change is a very reputable and positive organization that is using its resources to address global warming. The research has shown that different sources all agree that both global warming is a huge threat and that the Pew Center is positively addressing it. The Pew Center receives its funding from The Pew Charitable Trusts. Some companies are even exceeding Kyoto goals. Because the BELC companies openly admit that enough is known about global warming to address it, they actively participate in emission curbing activities. (“Social”). Dupont, another BELC member, has already cut its 1990 greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent. Other BELC companies, such as Toyota and Boeing are advancing company-wide programs for reducing carbon emission. Some BELC companies are also looking for alternative energy sources. In answering cui bono, one must first realize that The Pew Center on Global Climate Change isn’t looking to make a profit; The Pew Charitable Trusts contains billions of dollars. The environment benefits.
There are many interesting things I discovered as I researched the Pew Center and BELC. The Pew Center is funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts, thus BELC companies don’t contribute at all to the Pew Center. The Pew Center and BELC have formed a mutually advantageous relationship not centered on money. My research has showed that both The Pew Center and BELC companies heavily address the climate issue.
BELC. Pew Center. Nation 8 Aug. 2005.
Center. “WAS IT GLOBAL WARMING?” “Alcan Joins [BELC] to address global climate change.”
Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Pew Center.
The Pew Charitable Trusts. Pew Center. “Global Climate Coalition Cools Down.”
The Pew Center on Global Climate Change and the Business Environmental Leadership Council
Introduced Species
Species can be introduced into habitats where they are not native accidentally or intentionally, affecting native species and damaging habitats.
Without these population-limiting factors introduced species numbers can rapidly increase. Introduced species can predate or compete with native species, or diseases can be introduced.
Predation of native species can dramatically affect their numbers; species may be introduced as a biological control for native pest species, as a resource or just accidentally released.
Deliberate Eradication of Species
Environmental and Economic Positive aspects of applying Solar Power
The world needs clean and green energy according to International Energy Association (IEA). For example renewable energy, and capturing of energy from yeast and genetically engineered bacteria are now taking a leap in the energy industry. One flourishing industry and an interesting breakthrough in energy revolution is the waste to energy.
An example of waste to energy system is the biosphere technology of biosphere process system invented and developed by Dr. Chris McCormack, the CEO and Chairman of Global Environmental Energy Corporation.
Waste to Energy, Solution to Energy and Environmental Problems
Out of all the available renewable source of energies, solar energy is the most available one on the earth. Solar energy is highly advantageous with the environmental and economics point of view.
Solar energy is environmentally friendly. As solar energy is completely silent, it is free from noise pollution. Solar electricity is cheaper as compared to other sources of electricity.