Archive for August 2011
Funding Available for EMF Research, but Who Needs to Ask the Right Questions?
What are good professionals in questions of different types of people and professionals at the same time?
We need a new kind of team to the next study on electromagnetic frequencies to develop as many cross-cutting disciplines. Professionals do not have time to read all the newspapers in all other occupations. We need time to talk across disciplines. Some of these experts are not even speak the same (technical) language.
The types of occupations are involved in EMF research (and this is not an exhaustive list):
Adolescent Behavior, Animal Science, Anti-Cancer Research, Space Environmental Medicine bird flu, biochemistry, bio-electricity, biology, physics of biological systems, biological, biochemical, physiological,
Bioelectrochemistry, Bioelectromagnetics, bioenergetics, biophysiology, Neurodynamics Biophysics, Read the rest of this entry »
Environmental Monitoring – How Environmental Monitoring Can Increase the Quality of Life
Environmental Monitoring describes the processes and activities that are usually held to characterize and monitor the quality of the environment. This process is used in the preparation of environmental impact assessments, and in many cases in which human activities involve the risk of adverse effects on the natural environment. In a nutshell, refers to environmental monitoring, automatic sensors to measure all the parameters of the physical environment such as noise and atmosphere.
Environmental monitoring as a quality assurance
Been developed since the beginning of the science-based environmental monitoring, a number of quality indices for the classification and clarification of the meaning of large amounts of data.
Methods and procedures for risk assessment of pollution sources, exposure pathways, trends in time and space, anticipatory systems, evaluation of environmental quality and management practices have evolved over the years.
Read the rest of this entry »
Environmental Exposures and Cancer Risk
Between September 2008 and January 2009, an advisory committee in place of the optics of the National Cancer Institute, about the potential impact of environmental factors on cancer in our community. The group consists of three members appointed by the U.S. presidents who are qualified by education, experience and background, especially appointed to evaluate the national program against cancer. At least two members of the group are distinguished scientists or physicians.
This is the 240-page report in April 2010 before the President of the Cancer Control warning that “the real environmental impact of cancer has been grossly underestimated,” and calls for measures to reduce the exposure of large populations to carcinogens. It is worth reading for anyone interested in cancer prevention and the preservation of the survival of the human race. The report recommends several practices to reduce environmental impacts in our daily lives. We show some of the problems and issues in this report that we are “is your food killing you?” Already mentioned in our books Raised
Research on environmental causes of cancer by the low priority and inadequate funding is limited and there is a lack of focus on ecological research as a means of primary prevention of cancer, especially if they use accents research compared genetic and molecular mechanisms of cancer. The report notes that “to identify the efforts to quantify and control the environmental burdens that increase the risk of cancer, including single and combinations of exposure, resulting from the use of different measures, limits were complicated exposure assessment processes and structures the classification between the authorities in the U.S. and among nations. In addition, efforts hampered by a lack of measurement methods and effective tools. “‘s Current toxicity largely largely on animal studies at doses higher than that in all likelihood by the people to be found based and do not consider the adverse effects that occur at very low especially for the fetus and during childhood. This category is more vulnerable than adults at increased risk for cancer and other negative effects of almost all development shots. In addition, a potential agent is tested individually and not in combination with. other potential agents in the environment that makes the results of weak carcinogens is defective, or unsubstantiated environment are everywhere present in our soils, air, water and many consumer products.
Read the rest of this entry »